๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 464+ reviews
Women โœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

LOW CUT SOCK 3 PACK - Socks

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.8 out of 5 (464 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12.95
$21.58
Sale
โœ“ complimentary shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Pattern : PlainArticle number : AD1810017-A11

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
quick Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
user-friendly Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

LOW CUT SOCK 3 PACK - Socks

Pattern : Plain
Article number : AD1810017-A11​

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 5364

Category: Women > Clothing > Socks & Tights

Original Price:$21.58 USD

Sale Price: $12.95 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 8767 reviews
MK
Megan King โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท San Francisco, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
So glad I bought this
Quality LOW CUT SOCK 3 PACK - Socks for everyday use.
2 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Atlanta, GA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So glad I bought this
After a few days, the LOW CUT SOCK 3 PACK - Socks does its job and it works for me.
15 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท San Jose, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
extraordinary LOW CUT SOCK 3 PACK - Socks
Honestly, the LOW CUT SOCK 3 PACK - Socks works fine and it meets expectations.
25 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Austin, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
So happy with this
Personally, it works as described which is good enough.
6 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Portland, OR
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
remarkably pleased
After a few days, the LOW CUT SOCK 3 PACK - Socks works fine which feels reasonable.
43 people found this helpful