🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 685+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

925 vintage cross pendant

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (685 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13.54​
$22.57
Sale
βœ“ complimentary shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Sterling Silver Orange Spiny Gemstone Cross Pendant Enhancer

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
quick Shipping
↩️
user-friendly Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

925 vintage cross pendant

Sterling Silver Orange Spiny Gemstone Cross Pendant Enhancer

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 868873

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Pendants

Original Price:$22.57 USD

Sale Price: $13.54 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3579 reviews
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy love love!
In daily use, the 925 vintage cross pendant feels solid and it’s fine overall. Arrived on time.
20 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Miami, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
So far, the 925 vintage cross pendant performs as expected and it works for me.
38 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
remarkable 925 vintage cross pendant
magnificent quality materials in this 925 vintage cross pendant.
20 people found this helpful

ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
Everything works as expected with the 925 vintage cross pendant.
8 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson
3 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
simply what I wanted
For the price, it works fine which feels reasonable.
47 people found this helpful