🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 332+ reviews
Toys βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

TREASURE Junghwan Plush

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (332 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$44.65
$74.42
Sale
βœ“ complimentary shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

There is a tear in the box like in the last photo.prompt purchase is OK.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid fulfillment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

TREASURE Junghwan Plush

There is a tear in the box favor in the last photo.
swift purchase is OK.

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1914986

Category: Toys > Stuffed Animals & Plush > Stuffed Animals

Original Price:$74.42 USD

Sale Price: $44.65 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3244 reviews
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Worth every penny
Honestly, the TREASURE Junghwan Plush does its job so it’s acceptable. shipment was normal.​
11 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
In daily use, the TREASURE Junghwan Plush works fine and it works for me.
50 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase 
1 month ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
Personally, it feels okay and it works for me. dispatch was normal.
24 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Absolutely ideal
After a few days, the TREASURE Junghwan Plush fits my needs and it works for me.
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
purely what I wanted
The TREASURE Junghwan Plush works as expected.
23 people found this helpful